In this module, we continued to read and consider needs evaluations. Mears offered examples related to mass incarceration and sex crimes, and this module's supplements offer us some additional insights into how we conceptualize "needs." In particular, Pickett and colleagues (2015) document some interesting relationships between media consumption and opinions about criminal justice policy, specifically in light of individuals' prior knowledge of the criminal justice system. Meanwhile, Rudes and colleagues (2014) discuss researcher/practitioner partnerships, identifying elements of "functional" needs that overlap among stakeholders in the policy evaluation process.

In this week's discussion on needs evaluation, the second of two concerning this topic, we will discuss a practical matter: What amount of increase in a problem (e.g., crime) is needed before policy makers should take action? Should specific policies be reduced or eliminated if a social problem decreases? For example, if crime decreases, should policy makers reduce criminal justice funding because of the reduced need? Elaborate on your rationale!