07 Nov Examine Response to Intervention (RTI) and Evidence Based Practices (EBP)

In this assignment you will examine Response to Intervention (RTI) and Evidence Based Practices (EBP) and examine at least 3 Evidence Based Practices that can be used in RTI settings. RTI settings allow for a lot of room related to program delivery so you should be able to examine how RTI and EBP are connected in real life classrooms. You should also examine the role of evidence based practices and the criteria that you used to determine if these interventions were adequately vetted classroom practices. This paper is not to be lengthy – a maximum of 5 pages. The assignment rubric will be used for this assignment but feedback will be in comments about your submission. This paper should reflect the professional literature – not your opinion. As stated previously – no personal pronouns, please.

Rubric

Assignment and Discussion Rubric

Assignment and Discussion Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrasp Readings

4 ptsExcellentWriting and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments.

2 ptsGoodWriting and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail.

1 ptsDevelopingWriting and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion.

0 ptsNeeds ImprovementWriting and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

4 ptsExcellentPresents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue.

2 ptsGoodPosition/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining.

1 ptsDevelopingAnalysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion.

0 ptsNeeds ImprovementVague and general comments. Mostly opinion.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence

4 ptsExcellentEvidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated.

2 ptsGoodEvidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated.

1 ptsDevelopingEvidence is weak and lacking in detail. Some opinion.

0 ptsNeeds ImprovementEvidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Clarity

4 ptsExcellentThoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research.

2 ptsGoodThoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly.

1 ptsDevelopingJumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections.

0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics

4 ptsExcellentWhen applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues.

2 ptsGoodThoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues.

1 ptsDevelopingThere are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues.

0 ptsNeeds ImprovementUnacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors.

4 pts

Total Points: 20