Vol.:(0123456789)1 3

Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy (2020) 50:29–35 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-019-09438-3

ORIGINAL PAPER

Misophonia, Maladaptive Schemas and!Personality Disorders: A!Report of!Three Cases

Eleonora!Natalini1 !· Giancarlo!Dimaggio2!· Theodoros!Varakliotis1!· Alessandra!Fioretti1!· Alberto!Eibenstein1,3

Published online: 8 August 2019 © The Author(s) 2019

Abstract Misophonia is a chronic condition in which specific sounds cause intense negative emotions and autonomic arousal. Miso- phonia is considered a psychological disorder without any relationship with specific alterations of hearing receptors and independent from physical characteristics of the sound. Moreover if misophonia can be defined as a specific psychiatric disorder or a correlate of other conditions is still under debate. The patients were two women and one man. In this case series we first identified the presence of triggers sounds inducing misophonia as reported during the psychotherapy sessions. At a qualitative level all the three patients perceived that the others were intentionally acting with the purpose of underline their maladaptive interpersonal schemas. All the patients were evaluated with the use of questionnaires. Regarding personality dis- orders (PD) all three patients su!ered from at least one PD. As regard depression, one had moderate depression and one had severe depression. Two patients had moderate/severe anxiety. All the three patients can be considered as highly problematic in the interpersonal domain. Our findings have clinical implications for the treatment of misophonia because it seems to be sustained by underlying PD or maladaptive interpersonal schemas. The qualitative analysis of these cases has highlighted how patients with misophonia tended to ascribe intentionality to the people who emit the sounds that trigger their negative emotional reactions. Further studies are necessary to evaluate which kind of interpersonal patterns occur in these patients.

Keywords Misophonia"· Maladaptive schema"· Personality disorder"· Obsessive–compulsive personality disorder"· Anger"· Disgust

Introduction

Misophonia is a chronic condition in which the exposure to specific sounds increase the arousal and the recurrence of specific intense negative emotions, mostly anger. The word “misophonia” (“miso” means hate and “phonia” means sound) was first used by Jastrebo! and Jastrebo! (2001, 2002) who noted that some individuals had negative reac- tions to specific sounds. These negative reactions did not show any relationship with the physical characteristics of the

sound as in hyperacusis and the negative emotion, related to the sound exposure, was not fear as in the case of phonopho- bia. Patients with misophonia did not worry about a physical damage caused by the sound exposure like a hearing loss.

Trigger stimuli are usually represented by repetitive sounds, typically produced by other people (Edelstein et"al. 2013; Schröder et"al. 2013, 2017; Taylor 2017). Among these sounds the most common are: chewing, sni#ng, pen clicking, tapping and lip smacking. Some of these sounds are considered inappropriate in one’s dominant culture (Edel- stein et"al. 2013). Sometimes trigger sounds are coupled with visual stimuli, for example to see someone putting his hands into his own mouth which is known as misokinesia (Schröder et"al. 2013). Misophonia su!erers tend to expe- rience strong negative emotions, mostly anger and disgust (Edelstein et"al. 2013; Ferreira et"al. 2013; Schröder et"al. 2013) as a reaction to the trigger sounds. Physical reactions can be associated to the arousal due to sound exposure, e.g. increase of heart rate frequency and muscular tension (Dozier et"al. 2017). All these experiences drive the patient

* Alberto Eibenstein [email protected] Eleonora Natalini [email protected] 1 Tinnitus Center, European Hospital, Rome, Italy 2 Centro di Terapia Metacognitiva Interpersonale, Rome, Italy 3 Department of"Applied Clinical and"Biotechnological

Sciences, University of"L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy

30 Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy (2020) 50:29–35

1 3

to avoid the trigger sounds. It is important to note that peo- ple with misophonia do not adopt compulsions or rituals in order to prevent the exposure to the sounds, which make the di!erence from the diagnosis of obsessive compulsive disor- der (OCD). Neither they believe nor fear that their reactions are signs of a serious medical illness as it happens in health anxiety. Misophonia su!erers think they can loose control with an over-reaction and they blame themselves for this ten- dency as they consider them morally unacceptable (Schröder et"al. 2013). Their strain to avoid trigger sounds and the lim- ited interaction with other people results in social dysfunc- tions (Schröder et"al. 2013; Dozier et"al. 2017). It seems that misophonia is already present during development in child- hood and early teenage years (Schröder et"al. 2013; Kumar et"al. 2017; McGuire et"al. 2015; Rouw and Erfanian 2017) with symptoms that worsen over time (Kluckow et"al. 2014; Rouw and Erfanian 2017). Although systematic data upon its prevalence are not yet available, preliminary observa- tions suggest that misophonia is relatively common (Jastre- bo! and Jastrebo! 2014; Wu et"al. 2014). The current trend is to consider misophonia as a psychological, more than a pure neurophysiological disorder (Jastrebo! and Jastrebo! 2002, 2014; Kumar et"al. 2017) and the debate focuses on being a specific psychiatric diagnosis (Edelstein et"al. 2013; Schröder et"al. 2013) or a correlate of other conditions (Fer- reira et"al. 2013; Kluckow et"al. 2014; Webber et"al. 2014; Wu et"al. 2014; Reid et"al. 2016).

The role of!Personality Disorders and!Maladaptive Schemas

As noted above, some authors have observed that the physi- cal and emotional reactions of people with misophonia are not related to the physical characteristics of the sound itself. Trigger sounds are context-specific (Edelstein et"al. 2013) and misophonia su!erers think that people who produce the trigger sound do it intentionally (Reid et"al. 2016). Some patients report that misophonia is only activated by specific individuals, e.g. relatives or close friends, while it is not present if the same sound is produced by themselves or by animals or children (Edelstein et"al. 2013). Misophonia suf- ferers think that other people do not pay attention to them and do not give value to their needs (Bernstein et"al. 2013) thus reporting feelings of o!ence or violation (Edelstein et"al. 2013).

All these attributions are typical of persons with PD, who think that other people try to subjugate, criticize, dominate, exploit, deceive, disregard and humiliate them (American Psychiatric Association 2013). These patients typically endorse a representation of self as mistreated, constricted, harmed, damaged, humiliated, impotent, inadequate or frag- ile. These are the core elements of the so-called maladaptive schemas for self and others (Benjamin 1996; Dimaggio et"al.

2015; Young et"al. 2003) which are at the roots of the inter- personal dysfunction and of many symptom reactions in PD.

In particular, these aspects are characteristics not only of Borderline PD but also of the over-controlled inhibited fear- ful type, which is recently arousing much interest (Dimaggio and Overholser 2018; Fassbinder and Arntz 2018; Gordon- King et"al. 2018; Popolo et"al. 2018; Simonsen et"al. 2018). It is important to underline that most of the literature avail- able on misophonia (Bernstein et"al. 2013; Dozier 2015a,, b; Jastreboff and Jastreboff 2014; McGuire et"al. 2015; Schröder et"al. 2017) do not evidence neither the presence of PD nor maladaptive interpersonal schemas. As regard the co-occurrence of PD and misophonia, Schröder et"al. (2013) reported that 52.4% of their sample had OCPD and no other PD. Therefore the presence of PD and related schemas in misophonia are largely underestimated.

Aims and!Hypothesis

The goal of our study was to preliminary investigate the presence of PD and maladaptive interpersonal schemas in patients with misophonia. We hypothesized that (a) any kind of PD could be present, above and beyond OCPD and that (b) maladaptive interpersonal schemas would be clinically significant.

Methods

Participants

Patients referred to the Tinnitus Center in Rome, a private clinic with a specialized department for the diagnosis and the treatment of hearing disorders, between February 2016 and June 2017. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant both for the study and for the future publications. All procedures performed in the study involv- ing human participants were in accordance with the ethical standard of the local ethics committee. Inclusion crite- ria were: presence of at least moderate scores (10–14) on the Amsterdam Misophonia Scale (A-MISO-S; Schröder et"al. 2013). Exclusion criteria were: mental impairment or evidence of organic brain disorders, psychotic disorder or bipolar I disorder, drug and alcohol abuse. As regard to hearing disorders, patients with hyperacusis, hearing loss and tinnitus were excluded. Normal hearing was defined with a hearing threshold < 25"dB HL in all tested frequen- cies in both ears at the audiometric evaluation. Hypera- cusis was assessed with the loudness discomfort levels (LDLs). The tested frequencies were 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8"kHz. (Goldstein and Shulman 1996). All participants had normal hearing and normal LDLs. None of them had a

31Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy (2020) 50:29–35

1 3

psychiatric medication. Participants were 2 women (age 25 and 41) and 1 man (age 46) all Caucasian. The study was conducted by a psychotherapist and a medical doctor. The therapist was a licensed Cognitive Behavioral Therapist (CBT) with 5"years of clinical experience in hearing dis- orders. Assessment of hearing problems was performed by an Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) specialist and audiologist.

Instruments

Amsterdam Misophonia Scale (A-MISO-S; Schröder et"al. 2013) is a semi-structured interview which is not vali- dated. On 6-item scale (range 0–24) patients were asked about the (1) time they spend on misophonia, (2) inter- ference with social functioning, (3) level of anger, (4) resistance against the impulse, (5) control they had over their thoughts and anger, and (6) time they spend avoiding misophonic situations. Scores from 0 to 4 are considered subclinical misophonic symptoms, 5–9 mild, 10–14 mod- erate, 15–19 severe and 20–24 extreme.

Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV personality disorders (SCID-II; First et"al. 1997). The SCID-II is a structured clinical interview that assesses the full range of PD traits found in DSM IV PD. The interview was admin- istered by the treating clinician before the beginning of any physical or psychological treatment.

Young schema questionnaire (YSQ-L3; Young and Brown 2003) is a 232-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess 18 early maladaptive schemas (EMSs) grouped into five domains. Items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale with higher scores indicating greater presence of the EMS for the respondent. Scores for each schema are found by counting"the total number of items within each schema rated either 4, 5 or 6. Patients with PD, especially in the most severe forms, endorse many maladaptive sche- mas, while patients with higher functioning and no PD have no more than 1 or 2 heightened schemas.

Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II; Beck et"al. 1996). The BDI-II is a 21-item measure assessing depression over the previous 2"weeks. Higher scores suggest a high level of depression. The cuto! used are the following: 0–13 cor- responded to minimal depression, 14–19 to mild depres- sion, 20–28 to moderate depression and 29–63 to severe depression.

State-trait anxiety inventory (form-Y) (Spielberger et"al. 1983). The STAI-Y is a self-report instrument measur- ing state-anxiety (anxiety about an event) and trait-anx- iety (anxiety level as a stable characteristic). All items were rated on a 4-point Likert Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores have a correlation with a higher level of anxiety.

Case Descriptions

Roberto, 46"years old is a manager and has a stable roman- tic relationship. He comes from a patriarchal family where it was di#cult for the patient to express his own ideas “children must bring respect to adults”. The patient com- plains that he is not considered by other people and recog- nizes a tendency to avoid conflicts and fulfil others’ wishes due to the fear of being abandoned.

He asks for help because he does not tolerate the sounds and the sight of people who chew with open mouth and/or with voracity (crunching sounds and chewing), eat nails, snore and pen-clicking. When exposed to these sounds he feels to su!er a “physical violence” and a “torture”. He becomes angry at the idea that someone is hurting him and does not respect him. He is disgusted to attend at something that is unacceptable for him. The worst thing he fears is an exaggerated aggressive reaction when the trigger stimuli are present. Regarding the trigger sounds he believes he does not have the right to complain because he realizes that he is the only one annoyed and other people can judge him crazy or strange. To manage the negative emotions or to prevent their onset he brings some wax- earplugs and avoids to look at the person who makes the sound. When thoughts of aggressive reactions are present he moves away or makes a sound by snapping the fingers. Misophonia started in late childhood and was associated to the sounds made by his father. Misophonia has a major impact on his life. A typical story related to misophonia is structured like this: “I was at the table with my sister who starts eating bread before the meal with a lot of voracity. I feel the anger rising in me and I do not want to see that scene. I think that it is not polite to eat that way. Moreover she is getting fat and therefore she should not gorge on bread “.

Two episodes are significant: in the first one the patient was sitting in a bar and heard a crunching sound that caused a reaction of anger. When he realized it was a pigeon and that the sound was not intentionally produced by a human being, the annoyance suddenly disappeared. In the second episode he was exposed to the snoring of his partner and this usually irritates him, but no misophonia was experienced that time. He explained that day he felt guilty with his partner for something that he did and he realized that this awareness made him tolerate the snoring.

Elena 41"years old, is a professor, she is married and has two children. She describes her mother as anxious and her father as caring, although she does not report any episode with him. In"situations of conflict her father was on her mother side. Her older brother used to lecture and belittle her. She feels inadequate although she is a per- fectionist. She tries to avoid conflicts because she thinks

32 Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy (2020) 50:29–35

1 3

she is unable to impose her own ideas with the fear of being misunderstood. Misophonia started during her ado- lescence in the family environment and now it is activated also with her husband and with a work colleague. She came to therapy mainly to prevent the onset of misopho- nia with her children. The trigger sounds are: swallowing, chewing, eating nails, sneezing. This last sound is the only sound that causes misophonia even if emitted by people di!erent than those reported. She is worried by her possi- ble aggressive reactions if exposed to misophonic sounds, losing control and experiencing strong physical discom- fort (sti!ness, shortness of breath and agitation). She goes away when exposed to these sounds trying to avoid them and if not possible she eats, even if not hungry, to mask the misophonic sound. She often talks to herself to let her anger come out. The patient does not su!er of misophonia with children and animals but is very concerned about the possible occurence when the children will grow up. A typical situation may be: “I hear my husband’s sneeze, I feel angry as if I had been spiteful, I feel hatred and dis- gust. I think he is a useless person, that he should su!er too, I wish he would disappear “. The emotional reactions linked to the sounds are of anger and disgust. Elena reports an important observation: she noted that when misophonia is caused by her husband, all symptoms suddenly disap- pear if he shows a!ection and embraces her. Moreover, if she believes that the sound is legitimate, misophonia does not arise: for example, this happens if her mother produces sounds while drinking to take a drug.

Giorgia is 25"years old, she does not have a relationship and she is a university student. She comes from a patriarchal family. She had a good relationship with her mother while in conflict with her father because he did not understand her. She did not have a very good emotional connection to her brother. At school she felt teased and judged. Giorgia often complains about being “di!erent” in a certain way and sometimes she has the perception to be “crazy or strange”, these feelings getting worse with misophonia with the final belief to be inadequate and helpless. Anger is often present but suppressed because “I do not know how to react”. She asks for treatment because the misophonia, which started

during adolescence, became more and more serious. The barking of dogs was a trigger sound too so she could no longer relax.

The trigger sounds are: chewing, barking of dogs, tooth cleaning with a toothpick and kisses. The patient fears that if exposed to the trigger sound she can o!end the one who emits the sound, throw or break objects, scratch or tear the hair. She tries to avoid critical situations by moving away when possible. She also wear the headphones when neigh- bours’ dogs are barking and she thinks: “they should not live with a dog in a small apartment and leave it on a balcony to annoy other people they are really ignorant and rude with animals”. Sometimes misophonia is related to the sound of chewing and Giorgia reports these thoughts: “when I hear my father’s chewing I go away thinking about how strange I am and this will be a cause of su!ering for my parents” and “I’m strange, nobody wants me and I will not give nephews to my parents”. The emotions connected to these sounds are mainly anger and disgust, the latter as a specific reaction to sound of chewing.

Results

All three participants reported misophonic symptoms in the severe range (Tab. 1). As regards PD, all three patients su!ered from at least 1 PD. All three of them had OCPD. Roberto had co-occurrent Borderline PD (BPD) and Gior- gia had co-occurrent avoidant PD (APD), paranoid (PPD) and depressive PD with passive-aggressive traits. As regard symptoms, Roberto had moderate depression and Giorgia had severe depression. Finally, two patients had moderate/ severe anxiety (Table"1). For what concerns schemas, all three patients can be considered as problematic in the inter- personal domains. Giorgia endorsed maladaptive schemas in all domains. We found the same schemas in Roberto except for the “vulnerability to harm or illness”; particularly he felt deprived, abandoned, self-sacrificial and approval seeking. He had no self-control and was a perfectionist. Elena who su!ered from OCPD only, was mostly perfectionist.

Table 1 Results for Amsterdam misophonia scale (A-MISO-S), structured clinical interview for DSM-IV personality disorders (SCID II), beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II) and state- trait anxiety inventory (STAI-Y)

A-MISO-S SCID II Diagnosis

SCID II Total criteria

BDI-II STAI-Y State-anxiety Trait-anxiety

Giorgia 15 APD OCPD PPD

43 31 53 61

Elena 16 OCPD 13 6 35 44

Roberto 15 OCPD BPD

30 24 56 52

33Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy (2020) 50:29–35

1 3

The emerging pattern is that of people with widespread di#culties in making positive sense of interpersonal rela- tionships. The schema named unrelenting standards/hyper- criticalness, a sign of perfectionism, was heightened in all three patients, which is consistent with OCPD diagno- sis. Schemas of enmeshment, subjugation, self-sacrifice, approval-seeking and punitiveness were, in di!erent degrees, endorsed by all three patients.

Discussion

People with misophonia tend to experience negative reac- tions, e.g. hyperarousal and intense negative emotions in response to trigger sounds they think someone is intention- ally producing. We hypothesized that misophonia may be strongly related to maladaptive interpersonal schemas and to PD above and beyond the presence of OCPD (Schröder et"al. 2013). We performed an intensive quantitative analysis assessing PD and schemas with specific instruments and we investigated the qualitative levels (e.g. patients’ narratives). Results were consistent with predictions. All three patients with misophonia had at least one PD, particularly OCPD as reported in literature. OCPD is in fact the most com- mon co-occurrent PD within this condition (Schröder et"al. 2013). The idea is that PD, together with over-controlled and inhibited features (Dimaggio and Overholser 2018) can be associated with disabling symptoms. Other PD were found such as BPD, PPD and APD. Two in three patients had at least an association of two di!erent PD. This calls for fur- ther investigations in order to explore whether misophonia is mostly related to OCPD or also with other PD and which is the relationship with PD severity. As regards interpersonal problems, we found that maladaptive interpersonal sche- mas were heightened virtually in all domains. Perfection- ism was over-represented in all three cases, consistent with the trans-diagnostic aspects of PD (Dimaggio et"al. 2018). Moreover, the presence of schemas related to unrelenting standards and criticism suggests that these individuals are prone to over-control themselves and the human–environ- ment. Social interactions are based on rigid rules and spe- cific moral behaviour. When other people do not adhere to their norms the reaction is anger and disgust and this hap- pens with sounds that, in their opinion, should not be gener- ated. In their personal narratives all three patients reported that trigger sounds elicited negative emotions and behavioral reactions on the base of specific cognitive interpretations about the source of those sounds. They experienced distress when they thought that the sounds were produced intention- ally, failure to comply with their personal individual needs. They also tended to consider that other people were adopting a dominant position they cannot accept. On the contrary, if trigger sounds come from people they hurt or who took care

of them, negative emotions and hyperarousal disappeared. Moreover, if the source of the sound did not show any rela- tionship with human beings, initial arousal soon vanished.

Specifically, these processes are quite consistent with OCPD. These patients tend to report hostile-dominant interpersonal problems and high interpersonal distress (Gordon-King et"al. 2018). They are vindictive and cold in their interpersonal relationships (Cain et"al. 2015). Their need for interpersonal control (Dimaggio et"al. 2015; Lynch and Cheavens 2008) can lead to hostility and occasional explosive outbursts of anger (Villemarette-Pittman et"al. 2004). All the participants in our study perceive themselves as injured and/or felt disgusted from the behavior of oth- ers which they considered as unfair (Dimaggio et"al. 2017; Villemarette-Pittman et"al. 2004).

Conclusions

Our study has limitations, the first one is represented by the small sample size. The study must be extended to a larger sample. Other variables we did not include in our assessment can be associated to misophonia, such as history of trauma, disturbed attachment and emotional dysregulation.

With replication, our findings have clinical implica- tions. These patients would benefit of a therapy that will put together the available techniques currently used for miso- phonia (Bernstein et"al. 2013; Dozier 2015a, b; Jastrebo! and Jastrebo! 2014; McGuire et"al. 2015; Schröder et"al. 2017) with interventions on the underlying maladaptive interpersonal patterns and PD related problems associated with misophonia.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standard of the local ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent Informed consent was obtained from the individual participant included in the study.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Crea- tive Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribu- tion, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

34 Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy (2020) 50:29–35

1 3

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). DSM-5, diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington: American psychiatric association.

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the beck depression inventory–II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

Benjamin, L. S. (1996). Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of per- sonality disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

Bernstein, R. E., Angell, K. L., & Dehle, C. M. (2013). A brief course of cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment of misophonia: A case example. Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 6, e10–e13. https ://doi.org/10.1017/s1754 470×1 30001 72.

Cain, N. M., Ansell, E. B., Simpson, H. B., & Pinto, A. (2015). Inter- personal functioning in obsessive-compulsive personality disor- der. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(1), 90–99. https ://doi. org/10.1080/00223 891.2014.93437 6.

Dimaggio, G., MacBeth, A., Popolo, R., Salvatore, G., Perrini, F., Raouna, A., et"al. (2018). The problem of overcontrol: Perfection- ism and emotional inhibition as predictors of personality disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 83, 71–78. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j. compp sych.2018.03.005.

Dimaggio, G., Montano, A., Popolo, R., & Salvatore, G. (2015). Meta- cognitive interpersonal therapy for personality disorders: A treat- ment manual. London: Routledge.

Dimaggio, G., & Overholser, J. C. (2018). Treatment of Clients with Anxious and Over-controlled Personality Disorders: An Interna- tional Accord. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. https :// doi.org/10.1007/s1087 9-018-9403-1.

Dimaggio, G., Popolo, R., Montano, A., Velotti, P., Perrini, F., Buono- core, L., et"al. (2017). Emotion dysregulation, symptoms and interpersonal problems as independent predictors of a broad range of personality disorders in an outpatient sample. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 90, 586–599. https ://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12126 .

Dozier, T. H. (2015a). Counterconditioning treatment for misophonia. Clinical Case Study, 14, 374–387. https ://doi.org/10.1177/15346 50114 56692 4.

Dozier, T. H. (2015b). Etiology, composition, development and main- tenance of misophonia: A conditioned aversive reflex disorder. Psychological Thought, 8(1), 114–129. https ://doi.org/10.5964/ psyct .v8i1.132.

Dozier, T. H., Lopez, M., & Pearson, C. (2017). Proposed diagnos- tic criteria for misophonia: A multisensory conditioned aversive reflex disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1975. https ://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg .2017.01975 .

Edelstein, M., Brang, D., Rouw, R., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2013). Misophonia: physiological investigations and case descriptions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 296. https ://doi.org/10.3389/ fnhum .2013.00296 .

Fassbinder, E., & Arntz, A. (2018). Schema therap