Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Using the guidance from our text and page 8 from the IRIS Center Module, create your Comprehensive Behavior Management Plan. Your plan must include the following components: Specify gra - Essayabode

Using the guidance from our text and page 8 from the IRIS Center Module, create your Comprehensive Behavior Management Plan. Your plan must include the following components: Specify gra

 

  • Using the guidance from our text and page 8 from the IRIS Center Module, create your Comprehensive Behavior Management Plan. Your plan must include the following components:
    • Specify grade level and subject area
    • Statement of Purpose
    • Routines/Procedures
    • Rules
    • Logical Consequences
    • Intervention Plan for chronic discipline problems
    • Physical learning environment arrangements for 2-3 different learning activities
  • Requirements: Include an APA-formatted cover page, citations (where appropriate), and a References page.

 

Comprehensive Behavior Management Plan Rubric

Comprehensive Behavior Management Plan Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStatement of Purpose

15 pts

ADVANCED

The statement is concise and uses clear, positive language that explains the purpose of the classroom. Specifies expectations for students. Reasons for the four components of the plan are included. 4-6 sentences.

12 pts

PROFICIENT

The statement is concise and uses clear, positive language that explains the purpose of the classroom. Reasons for the four components of the plan are included. 2-3 sentences.

10 pts

BASIC

The statement uses language that explains the purpose of the classroom. Reasons for 2-3 components of the plan are included. 1-3 sentences.

8 pts

MINIMAL

The statement uses vague language that implies the purpose of the classroom. Reasons for the four components of the plan are missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProcedures

35 pts

ADVANCED

5 or more routines are named. The process for each routine is described in explicit steps. Discussion and rationale of 3 or more SEL standards that would help students perform each routine are included.

29 pts

PROFICIENT

3-5 routines are named. The process for each routine is described in explicit steps. Discussion and rationale of 1-2 SEL standards that would help students perform each routine are included.

24 pts

BASIC

3-5 routines are named. The process for each routine and 1-2 SEL standards are described in general terms.

19 pts

MINIMAL

1-2 routines are named. The process for each routine or SEL standard is limited or missing.

35 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #1 – Learner Development

The teacher understands how children learn and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical areas, and designs and implements developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.

3 pts

Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.

2 pts

Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking

1 pts

Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClassroom Rules

35 pts

ADVANCED

3-5 logical rules are listed. Each rule is worded positively. A complete explanation for each rule includes why it is necessary and how it is culturally responsive. Explanation specifically refers to the definition of a discipline problem. A detailed process for communicating the rules to students and obtaining student commitment is included.

29 pts

PROFICIENT

3-5 logical rules are listed. Each rule is worded positively. A complete explanation for each rule includes why it is necessary and how it is culturally responsive. A detailed process for communicating the rules to students and obtaining student commitment is included.

24 pts

BASIC

3-5 rules are listed. A partial explanation for each rule includes why it is necessary or how it is culturally responsive; OR a complete explanation is given for some of the rules. A general process for communicating the rules to students OR obtaining student commitment is included.

19 pts

MINIMAL

1-2 rules are listed. An explanation for each rule is minimal or missing. A process for communicating the rules to students OR obtaining student commitment is limited or missing.

35 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2 – Learning Differences

The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.

3 pts

Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.

2 pts

Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.

1 pts

Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConsequences

35 pts

ADVANCED

Logical consequence/s are explained for each classroom rule (5+). Each consequence is rational and related directly to the behavior.

29 pts

PROFICIENT

Logical consequence/s are explained for each classroom rule (3-5). Each consequence is rational and related directly to the behavior.

24 pts

BASIC

Logical consequence/s are explained for at least half of the classroom rules. The consequences are related to the behavior.

19 pts

MINIMAL

Contrived consequence/s are explained for each classroom rule (1-2). The consequences may not be related directly to the behavior.

35 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeINTASC 1.2

Development The teacher understands how children learn and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical areas, and designs and implements developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences. threshold: 3.0 pts

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.

3 pts

Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.

2 pts

Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking

1 pts

Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.

0 pts

No Evidence

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntervention Plan for Chronic Disruptive Behavior

35 pts

ADVANCED

Plan includes a detailed account of steps in solving chronic disruptive behaviors using foundational AND belief-based strategies and a clear rationale for the plans.

29 pts

PROFICIENT

Plan includes a detailed account of steps in solving chronic disruptive behaviors (foundational or belief-based strategies) and a clear rationale for the plan.

24 pts

BASIC

Plan includes a general explanation of steps in solving chronic disruptive behaviors (foundational or belief-based strategies) and a general reason for the plan.

19 pts

MINIMAL

Plan has a limited or vague explanation of steps in solving chronic disruptive behaviors unrelated to foundational or belief-base strategies. A reason for the plan is limited or missing.

35 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeINTASC 1.3

Learner Development 

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.

3 pts

Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.

2 pts

Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking

1 pts

Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.

0 pts

No Evidence

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCAEP R1.1 The Learner and Learning

threshold: 3.0 pts

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?



4 pts

Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.

3 pts

Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.