23 Sep Select a country and provide a brief overview of its recent international trade with two of its trade partners, including data and graphs. 2. Provide a theoretical g
Topic: Write a report of up to 1500 words (excluding references), consisting of three tasks:
1. Select a country and provide a brief overview of its recent international trade with two of its trade
partners, including data and graphs.
2. Provide a theoretical grounding for the observed trade patterns using the theories developed in the course
(Gravity, Ricardian, H-O, Standard Trade Model or New Trade Theory).
3. Evaluate how well your proposed model fit the data.
This topic provides ample scope for using data. Descriptive statistics, graphs and tables, will be sufficient. You
are not required to do econometric analysis
ECON7530 Country Trade Report Marking Rubric – Semester 2, 2023
(Marks for each part are given in parentheses, 30 marks in total)
Criteria 4 3 2 1 0
Task 1 – Clarity of
trade overview (4)
Clear and precise
overview, with proper
support from the
data/sources provided
Good overview,
though one trading
partner can be
improved, by clearer
explanation, and/or
support from
data/sources
Flawed overview in
either or both trading
partners, either
inaccurate or with
severe lack of support
by data/sources
Very flawed
overview in both
trading partners,
either very inaccurate
or not supported by
data/sources
No, or irrelevant
overview given
Task 2 – Use of trade theories, and clarity of explanation (4)
– Partner 1 –
Explanation (2)
Trade theory clearly
stated and defined,
and good
explanations, with
good use of research
to reflect the
arguments.
Trade theory stated
but may not be well
defined; or with
flawed explanation
and/or severe lack of
evidence.
No attempt shown
– Partner 2 –
Explanation (2)
Similar to above
Similar to above, or if
the same trade model
is used
Criteria 4 3 2 1 0
Task 3 – Evaluation of how well the model fits the trade relationship (8)
– Discussion on
Partner 1 (4)
Very clear and
insightful discussion.
The arguments are
valid, and both sides
of the argument
(including
shortcomings of the
model’s fit) are given,
and discussed in
detail, with excellent
evidence support, and
clear justification on
why the student chose
the model overall
Good discussion,
though some
arguments are flawed.
Both sides of the
argument are given
and discussed, with
good evidence
support. There is
clear justification on
why the student
chose the model
overall
Flawed discussion
overall, with some
irrelevant arguments,
or the student’s
conclusion is not
clear. Both sides of
the argument are
mentioned, with some
extent of evidence
support.
Very flawed
discussion, and not
all sides of the
argument are
discussed, or with
very limited evidence
support. It might not
be clear why the
student chose the
model overall
No attempt shown
– Discussion on
Partner 2 (4) Similar to above
No attempt shown, or
if the same trade
model is used
Evidence of research and use of relevant data (4)
Excellent evidence of
research and relevant
data are used,
arguments are
supported by highly
suitable and relevant
sources in all sections
Good evidence of
research and relevant
data provided and
explained, with most
arguments supported
by suitable and
relevant sources in
most sections
Flawed evidence of
research, with some
arguments in some
sections not
supported by suitable
and relevant sources
Either some key
arguments are not
supported by relevant
sources/data, or
sources/data are
provided but not
explained in detail,
reflecting a lack of
depth in reading
No, or very
inconsequential
evidence of research
and/or choice of
suitable sources
Criteria 4 3 2 1 0
Writing quality (5)
– Essay format (1) Clear, and relevant
introduction and
conclusion
No, or irrelevant
introduction or
conclusion given
– Writing style (1) Academic writing
style is used, with a
good flow between
paragraphs, sections,
or discussion points
Academic writing
style is not used, or
there is no essay flow
between paragraphs,
sections, or discussion
points
– Grammar,
Structural clarity
(3)
Both grammar and
spelling are faultless
throughout the essay
There are occasional
grammatical and/or
spelling errors but
these do not affect
readability of the
essay
Spelling and/or
grammar is
consistently incorrect,
hindering the report's
‘flow’ and readability.
The grammar and
spelling are too poor
to make sense of most
of the essay
Presentation (1)
The essay has a cover
page, detailing name,
student ID, and word
count
Not all details are
given, or the word
limit is not followed
Criteria 4 3 2 1 0
Reference (4)
– Reference style
(2)
Reference style,
including reference
list and in-text
citations, is consistent,
and the reference list
is alphabetically
ordered
Reference style,
including reference
list and in-text
citations, is mostly
consistent with some
errors, and the
reference list is
alphabetically ordered
Inconsistent, or
incorrect reference
style
Important note: even
if students use the
reference tools from
database such as UQ
Library or Google
Scholar, please
double check them
as they might be
incorrect
– Reference quality
(2)
Quality academic
and/or news sources
are chosen, which
greatly support the
arguments
Flawed/missing
reference list and/or
irrelevant/missing in-
text citations
Inconsequential, or no
reference given
,
ECON7530 – Semester 2, 2023
Country Trade Report
Deadline: Thursday 05 October 2023 16:00
Topic: Write a report of up to 1500 words (excluding references), consisting of three tasks:
1. Select a country and provide a brief overview of its recent international trade with two of its trade
partners, including data and graphs.
2. Provide a theoretical grounding for the observed trade patterns using the theories developed in the course
(Gravity, Ricardian, H-O, Standard Trade Model or New Trade Theory).
3. Evaluate how well your proposed model fit the data.
This topic provides ample scope for using data. Descriptive statistics, graphs and tables, will be sufficient. You
are not required to do econometric analysis. You are required to use a good mix of sources including the internet,
textbooks, newspapers, and academic journals, articles from newspapers and business magazines. You must
provide a list of full-ranged references used or referred to in the essay.
Criteria & Marking
The total mark for this assignment is 30, which consists of the following criteria:
• Clarity of trade overview (4 marks)
• Use of trade theories and clarity of explanation (4 marks)
• Evaluation of the trade model’s fit to the data (8 marks)
• Evidence of research and use of relevant data (4 marks)
• Writing quality (including essay flow, accuracy, spelling, punctuation, grammar) (5 marks)
• Presentation (including identification and compliance of word limit) (1 mark)
• Referencing (4 marks)
In addition, there are some general points to consider:
• You cannot use the same trade model for both trading partners.
• You must have dedicated Introduction and Conclusion to the report.
• Your essay must have a cover page detailing your name, student ID, and word count.
• Remember to give a total word count (excluding references) on the cover page.
• Any reference style is allowed, but it must be consistent (i.e. same style throughout the essay).
• Please check your citation’s accuracy, even if it is pre-filled from Google Scholar or UQ Library.
• You cannot cite Wikipedia or Investopedia.
• If graphs/figures are used, remember to quote the source.
• Use academic writing style and not creative writing style.
• Do not plagiarize! It will be dealt with very seriously in UQ and is simply not worth trying.
Common Mistakes
Some common mistakes that lead to mark deduction are:
• Overly relying on a few reference sources which are not that credible, such as newspapers.
• Citing a lot of figures but without pointing out their implications.
• Focusing on a few things only and therefore lack of comprehensiveness in the analysis.
• Inappropriate referencing formats, such as not indicating the article titles or not indicating what points
they referred to.
• Inconsistency between the analysis and the conclusion.
• Student cut and pasted statements/sentences from various sources instead of writing in their own
words. Consequently, those “Frankenstein statements” did not read smoothly and did not provide a
coherent view of what was going on.
Submission:
Each student should submit a Word or PDF file through the Turnitin link on the Blackboard course website.
Submission through email will not be accepted. All submissions will be run through the Turnitin anti-plagiarism
software.
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.