Chat with us, powered by LiveChat NURS_5051_Module03_Week05 - Essayabode

NURS_5051_Module03_Week05

Post a description of at least one potential benefit of using big data as part of a clinical system and explain why. Then, describe at least one potential challenge or risk of using big data as part of a clinical system and explain why. Propose at least one strategy you have experienced, observed, or researched that may effectively mitigate the challenges or risks of using big data you described. Be specific and provide examples.

 

NURS_5051_Module03_Week05_Discussion_Rubric

Grid View

List View

Excellent Good Fair Poor

Main Posting

Points Range:45 (45.00%) – 50 (50.00%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range:40 (40.00%) – 44 (44.00%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range:35 (35.00%) – 39 (39.00%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 34 (34.00%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness

Points Range:10 (10.00%) – 10 (10.00%)

Posts main post by day 3.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response

Points Range:17 (17.00%) – 18 (18.00%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range:15 (15.00%) – 16 (16.00%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range:13 (13.00%) – 14 (14.00%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 12 (12.00%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response

Points Range:16 (16.00%) – 17 (17.00%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range:14 (14.00%) – 15 (15.00%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range:12 (12.00%) – 13 (13.00%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 11 (11.00%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation

Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Name:NURS_5051_Module03_Week05_Discussion_Rubric

 

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?