18 Nov Assessment 2 Instructions: Leadership and Group Collaboration

Order Instructions

Assessment 2 Instructions: Leadership and Group Collaboration

PRINT

 

Draft a 1,500-2,000-word response to a fictional supervisor that identifies a successful leader and describes what makes him or her successful. Next, compare his or her approaches, styles, values, and other important leadership attributes to your own and make recommendations on how to lead and foster teamwork.

 

Introduction

One of the hallmarks of successful leaders is their ability to communicate and foster team cooperation. Mastering these skills is a career-long process, but one that is sure to pay dividends.

 

The assessments in this course build upon one another and must be completed in the order presented.

 

Preparation

Use the following documents to complete this assessment:

 

Leadership and Group Collaboration Scenario [PDF].

Leadership and Group Collaboration Response Template [DOCX].

Instructions

Draft a professional response to your supervisor in the Leadership and Group Collaboration Scenario [PDF] using the Leadership and Group Collaboration Response Template [DOCX].

 

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

 

Format: Complete your assessment using the Leadership and Group Collaboration Response Template.

Sources: Please reference at least two sources from your own research. You may cite multiple supporting examples from each source.

APA format: Use current APA style to format your paper and to cite your research sources in-text and in a references page.

Length: 1,500–2,000 words.

Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12-point font and double-spaced lines.

Written communication:

Express your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently.

Use correct grammar and mechanics.

Proofread your writing.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

 

Competency 1: Analyze leadership traits and styles.

Analyze why a chosen leader is well-suited for a specified project.

Compare one’s own leadership traits against those of a successful leader.

Analyze one’s own strengths and weaknesses in the context of a project.

Competency 2: Apply accepted leadership practices and behaviors.

Describe an approach that would likely be effective in facilitating collaboration among a professional team.

Competency 3: Communicate professionally and effectively.

Address assessment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.

Portfolio Prompt: You should consider adding this assessment to your personal ePortfolio. For more information on ePortfolio, visit the Campus ePortfolio page.

 

 

 

eadership and Group Collaboration Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Analyze why a chosen leader is well-suited for a specified project. Does not analyze why a chosen leader is well-suited for a specified project. Analyzes why a chosen leader is well-suited for a specified project in a disorganized or confusing manner, or with significant errors or omissions. Analyzes why a chosen leader is well-suited for a specified project. Analyzes why a chosen leader is well-suited for a specified project in detail that includes several specific supporting examples from research.

Compare one’s own leadership traits against those of a successful leader. Does not compare one’s own leadership traits against those of a successful leader Compares one’s own leadership traits against those of a successful leader in a manner that is confusing, disorganized, or not relevant. Compares one’s own leadership traits against those of a successful leader. Compares one’s own leadership traits against those of a successful leader in great detail that highlights similarities and contrast differences with specific supporting examples from research.

Analyze one’s own strengths and weaknesses in the context of a project. Does not identify one’s own strengths and weaknesses in the context of a project. Identifies one’s own strengths and weaknesses in the context of a project Analyzes one’s own strengths and weaknesses in the context of a project. Analyzes one’s own strengths and weaknesses in the context of a project in detail that includes several specific supporting examples from research.

Describe an approach that would likely be effective in facilitating collaboration among a professional team. Does not identify an approach to facilitating collaboration among a professional team. Identifies an approach that would likely be ineffective in facilitating collaboration among a professional team. Describes an approach that would likely be effective in facilitating collaboration among a professional team. Describes an approach that would likely be effective in facilitating collaboration among a professional team that incorporates multiple techniques.

Address assessment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences. Does not respond to the assessment prompt and/or does not organize text appropriately, uses inappropriate tone, or does not include structurally sound sentences. Addresses the assessment purpose with minimal issues related to evidence, tone, and sentence structure. Addresses assessment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences. Presents a focused purpose through strong organizational skills. Presents evidence through strong paraphrasing or summarizing and appropriate tone and sentence structure.